Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD Lens for Sony E (A056)

(38 customer reviews)

£1,169.00

Out of stock

SKU: CA53998 Category:

Description

Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD Lens for Sony E (A056)

Item details:

Brand new in retail box
Sold by VAT registered UK company
We are a high rated retailer with a track record of excellent service
We only sell high quality products

Additional information

Product code

CA53998
Barcode

4960371006680
Barcode2

0725211560012
Weight

1.5
Brand

Tamron

38 reviews for Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD Lens for Sony E (A056)

  1. Ghizlane –

    Arriva a casa, apri la confezione ClickElectronics e poi ? Ti trovi una scatola tra le più economiche, SENZA SIGILLO, ok non importa ? Tiri fuori l’ottica e….visto che hai speso 1.500 €… non parli, non commenti, xke fin qui zero soddisfazioni, sembra vuoto all’interno e troppo delicato, anzi lo è, anche solo x provarlo, inserendo 2/3 volte il paraluce, hai già dei piccoli segni di usura, ma dai ! Ok sono abituatuo alla serie Gm, ma volevo la sua praticità, piccolo e leggero lo è sicuramente, ma per me è NO !

  2. Ruth Traynor –

    Ich glaube zu diesem Objektiv muss man nicht allzu viel schreiben. Wer sich dies kaufen möchte, der hat sich sicherlich vorher schon informiert und diverse Tests etc. angeschaut.Es ist ein super Objektiv und macht grandiose Bilder. Viele bemängeln die fehlenden Schalter und Knöpfe am Objektiv und das es aus Plastik ist. Aber hey es ist 1000€ günstiger als die Sony Alternative.Es ist top verarbeitet und fühlt sich trotz Plastik wertig an. Vor allem ist es ziemlich klein und leicht. Ich hatte das 70-200 F4 von Sony und dieses hier ist noch kleiner und hat F2.8. Ja es fehlen 20mm aber dafür ist es kompakter und günstiger.Wie bereits erwähnt ein super Objektiv zu einem super Preis.

  3. John Jacques –

    I gave this lens 5/5 because i think it’s really quite a stellar engineering achievement. That doesn’t mean there aren’t negatives to the lens. It just means that i understand that trade-offs had to be there to ensure that the lens is realizable.For example, you can’t deride this lens’s light plastics and telescoping zoom if you enjoy its compactness, lightness and cost. Nor can you say that it’s missing image stabilization, as that too reduces the lens weight, size and cost.The only point of ****CAUTION**** i have about this lens, as well as all Tamron lenses purchased on ClickElectronics. Even if you purchase it from ClickElectronics Prime (ie NOT a 3rd party seller), you will NOT receive the Canadian warranty. WARNING! I emailed Tamron to confirm and they did indeed state that ClickElectronics is not an authorized reseller of Tamron products.

  4. Mrs Ed –

    Mal ganz im Ernst. Wo kriegt man momentan ein Objektiv mit einer durchgängigen Blende von 2.8 zu so einem Preis und dann noch bei dieser Qualität.Wirklich toll was Tamron hier für die Sony Kameras am entwickeln ist.Getestet wurde das Objektiv einmal auf der Sonyalpha 6400 und auf der Sony A7R III (Die Katzenbilder sind von der A7R III / das Hundebild Sonyalpha 6400).Bei beiden Kameras war auch bei schnellen Bewegungen der Autofocus sehr gut und hat wenn er mal daneben lag mein Ziel schnell wieder eingefangen.Eine ganz klare Empfehlung meinerseits!

  5. John Hampson –

    Knackscharf und leicht

  6. Alex Slight –

    After a lifetime of shooting with Canon cameras, I recently switched to the Sony mirrorless system with a Sony a9. With a Sigma lens adapter, I can still use my amazing Canon lenses, but being that they are non-native lenses to the Sony, they work for stationary and slow to medium moving subjects. The Canon lenses can’t keep up with the fast action that the Sony a9 camera body is so famous for. So I knew that a few new lenses need to be added.I’ve spent enough time behind a camera to know pretty quickly whether a lens is working for me or not. After testing several Sony lenses that were lack-luster and were returned, I decided to give this one a try. I have the equivalent of this lens from Canon. And it is the finest lens that I own. To my shock and amazement, this little gem of Tamron’s is exceeding my expectations. It’s about half the weight, half the size and a fraction of the price of my equivalent Canon lens. Why did I need this if I already have the Canon 2.8 lens you ask? Because I have no interest in hiking, walking and exploring long distances with a lens the size and weight of a sewer pipe hanging around my neck. This little Tamron is the perfect hiking companion. It is much more of a “walk-about” lens than my Canon one is.For me there are two things that I look for in any camera lens. A: Sharpness B: Consistency of performance. This lens aces both. I will pay more for these qualities, but in this case, you don’t have to. The fixed 2.8 aperture is such an amazing thing to have in a lens and this lens syncs up with my Sony a9 perfectly. There is a slight “clunking” sound when the lens focuses, but with the reading that I’ve done, this is normal, so it’s fine.I’ve found that I can get to within about 14″ of my subject while zoomed all the way in, which gives this lens a bit of a “macro” feature…not a true macro, but very nice for a mid-range zoom.Tamron used a lot of plastic on this lens to keep the weight down. It feels very solid to me. I’m not hard on my camera gear, so I don’t see that as a problem. Also, there is no image stabilization within the lens. I shot in all kinds of light and I admit that I’ve got a fairly steady hand, so that is not going to be an issue for me at all. And my camera body has some stabilization built in to it.For the money, you just can’t beat this lens for your Sony E mount cameras. There is a reason that most photographers are giving this thing five stars. I’ll let my images speak for themselves.

  7. simon stephen ward –

    Blende 2.8 ist toll für Freistellung aber weil ich bevorzuge 85 1.4 für Portraits reich mir die Blende F4. Deswegen habe ich mich doch entschieden für das Sony 70-200 f4 und bereue es überhaupt nicht. Das Tamron zurück geschickt. Die Haptik, zusätzliche Tasten und Schalter, Stabi usw. hat das Tamron nicht, und das Plastik ist eben Plastik. Trotzdem 4 Sterne und nicht 3 weil die Bildqualität ist richtig gut.

  8. Susan K. –

    Eigentlich ein tolles Objektiv.

  9. Miss E. –

    This lens replaced my Sony FE 70-200 f/4

  10. Karina Wein –

    I’ve seen all the good reviews online,,….. and I was still impressed

Add a review