Description
Canon EF-S 18-200mm F/3.5-5.6 IS Lens (Retail Packing)
Item details:
Brand new in retail box
Sold by VAT registered UK company
We are a high rated retailer with a track record of excellent service
We only sell high quality products
Canon EF-S 18-200mm F/3.5-5.6 IS Lens (Retail Packing)
£409.00
Out of stock
Additional information
| Product code | CA41207 |
|---|---|
| Barcode | 4960999575056 |
| Barcode2 | 0013803092752 |
| Weight | 1.5 |
| Brand | Canon |
60 reviews for Canon EF-S 18-200mm F/3.5-5.6 IS Lens (Retail Packing)
You must be logged in to post a review.
Conor Bird –
Ritengo questo obiettivo eccellente, forse perche’ sono un dilettante nel ramo fotografico, per le foto che ho fatto fino ad oggi. Ne sono convinto dopo aver letto in qualche recensione che la messa a fuoco automatica e’ lenta, a me sembra ottima. Consiglio l’acquisto e di tenerlo sempre fisso alla reflex.
Miriam Khan –
Firstly, a short story. This lens and I have a chequered history: since it first went on sale in 2008 I’ve owned 4 of them! I sold the first one to get the Tamron 18-270, wasn’t happy with it, so re-bought the Canon (2nd lens). Some time later Sigma released the 18-250, so I sold the Canon again. I kept the Sigma for a year or so, but then tried the Canon again when the 7D DSLR came out, and bought it again (3rd lens). Then Tamron released the 16-300 which offered a substantial range increase over the Canon, so I had that for a year. And in January 2016, I tried the Canon again, and bought it gain (4th lens).Let’s get this out of the way: any superzoom is going to be a lens of compromises. At 11x zoom range, this lens is no exception – it’s not going to compete for image quality with the high-end Canon ‘L’ zooms, many of which are no more than 3x or 4x zoom range. Superzooms are perfect lenses to carry around on a small DSLR when travelling and space is at a premium, or for those short trips where photography isn’t the primary goal, but you don’t want to be without a decent camera.Now that we’ve dealt with that, this is still the best superzoom available for the Canon format – and as you’ve read above, I’ve tested a lot of them. There are a lot of options to choose from in this market: Sigma have an 18-200, 18-250 and an 18-300; Tamron have an 18-270 and a 16-300; and of course Canon have this 18-200.Looking at image quality in a little more detail, this is probably the only superzoom I’d willingly use wide open. As with other superzooms, sharpness does improve down to f/8 and the extremes of the zoom range do suffer edge softness to some extent. There is some chromatic aberration, particularly at the wide end, but that’s not difficult to correct in Lightroom.Compared to all 3 Sigma superzooms, the Canon is better in every respect, and at all focal lengths I tested. Compared to the Tamrons, the Canon is better than the 18-270, and on par with the 16-300. The Tamron is better at the telephoto end; the Canon better at the wide angle end. So if your use is mostly 150mm or greater, then go with the Tamron, but if your use is mostly wide angle, the Canon probably performs better. It’s close though.There’s no escaping the mechanics of this lens are old: there’s no ultrasonic motor, so the focus ring rotates rather annoyingly when focusing, and it’s far from silent, so would be a poor choice for a video lens. For £350 you’d think Canon would have included a lens hood, but no, that’s a £30 extra, which is really quite offensive at this price point.In summary, yes, a lens of compromises, somewhat out of date, but with no replacement on the horizon, it’s still the best balance of compromises I’ve seen in a superzoom to date.
peter hancock –
great
Martin Bradshaw –
Great all purpose lens
mamansoise –
It does the job very well and I am very pleased with it
MR G D MORROW –
nice images BUT the lens is very loose and if …
Phill Hambrook –
A lovely lens – highly recommended
Abigail Thomas –
Excellent; my favourite lens
Harvey Bowron –
A great multi-purpose lens
charmaine –
Great little lens!